Button Text

BFR vs. Sub. Fat vs. Fat Mass on Dara for Goal Setting

Homepage Forums Behavior Change and Goal Setting BFR vs. Sub. Fat vs. Fat Mass on Dara for Goal Setting

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #10216

    Alexis
    Participant

    Hi, Kate.

    I’ve been using my Dara scale for approx. 2 months. I know I want to reduce my body fat but which dataset is the most useful/helpful to watch?

    My BFR is 26.4, Subcutaneous Fat is 27.8% and my Fat Mass is 45.5. My muscle mass is 99.4.

    Thank you! Alexis

  • Author
    Replies
  • #10263

    Kate
    Administrator

    Hi! I would watch weight, body fat percentage, and muscle rate. Those are what I find to be the most beneficial. Secondary metrics would be Muscle Mass and Fat Mass – however, change is reflected SLOWLY so that’s why it’s helpful to have a secondary form of tracking like photos, videos, or behavior/stress/mood management.

    If you want to keep an eye on subcutaneous fat as well you could – that number should trend downwards. Visceral fat is the fat that surrounds organs and joints, and subcutaneous fat is the fat under the skin that we burn/oxidize in fat loss protocols.

    Does that make sense?

  • #10290

    Alexis
    Member

    It does thank you! I think I will add in the pictures as a second metric. I’m lucky that my visceral fat is low, the booty and legs get my fat distribution.

Log in to reply.

NOW AVAILABLE
FOR IOS & ANDROID

Download the app!